DRAFT VERSION #1  (Jonathan Mark)


I haven't received an advocacy argument for this version from Jonathan, but I think the that the following exchange may serve as a helpful introduction:

Question:  As the proposition (Explosive Evidence: A Call for Truth Over Treason) stands, it references the evidence mentioned in the Feb. 24 minutes, but essentially this is the same as the draft you have posted on 911 Blogger, right?  In other words, to vote yes on the proposal is to accept your draft version, right?

Answer from Jonathan Mark:  Yes and No.. supporting the question I proposed would be to support general campaigns using such Misprision laws based on such specific evidence.. but it would not be limited to any individual's interpretation of the laws, or the individual expression of their free speech. That is independent of our vote. However, as a group, we are reasserting the accuracy of the evidence we examined, and support it as a basis to question and challenge the US government for acts that could be seen as treasonous or at the least, a felony crime, which is still happening by a cover-up and using a false rationale to justify invading and occupying other nations.  This general campaign is an attempt to include the anti-war activists with a direct action that goes to the root of the administrations' justification for the wars.. based on science and evidence. That is the substance that we would be supporting.. not individual actions using the basis of fact from independent research and observation.

Explosive Evidence: A Call for Truth Over Treason

Stop War by exposing the 9/11 Cover-up

Misprision of felony or treason is the ‘offense of concealing knowledge of a felony or treason by
one who has not participated or assisted in it.’ The Constitution of the United States, Article III, defines
treason against the United States to consist only in levying war against them, or in adhering to their
enemies, giving them aid or comfort. The events of September 11 was described as an act of war by
President Bush, and used to justify expanding the war in Afghanistan by President Obama. These
administrations are perhaps guilty of criminal acts or treason, based on the following evidence of a
cover-up and misuse-distortion of the actual events of September 11, 2001.

Misprision of treason - Whereas, US code 18 (Sec. 2382) - Misprision of treason, - states: "Whoever, owing
allegiance to the United States and having knowledge of the commission of any treason against them, conceals and does
not, as soon as may be, disclose and make known the same to the President or to some judge of the United States, or to the governor or to some judge or justice of a particular State, is guilty of misprision of treason and shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than seven years, or both." It follows that anyone who has knowledge of treason or a crime in the events of September 11, 2001, or obstruction of justice against the United States, has a responsibility to notify the stated authorities. Therefore, the undersigned citizen of the United States of America, in accordance with the
law pertaining to Misprision of felony or treason, agrees to file the following evidence to "some judge of the United States, or . . . governor or . . .judge or justice of a particular State."

Evidence of Treason

The National Institute for Standards and Technology (NIST) reported that World Trade Center 7
collapsed due to fire damage. If that is the case, it would be the first steel-framed skyscraper in history to
undergo total collapse from fire alone. The fact that NIST refused to even consider explosive demolition
when it is the most likely hypothesis and fits all of the available evidence is, in and of itself, grounds for
suspicion of a cover-up. Fire doesn’t pulverize 90,000 tons of concrete to powder. Explosives do.
Crucial evidence from the World Trade Center crime scene, including most of the steel from WTC 1, 2
and 7, was deliberately shipped away and destroyed before it could be properly examined.

The Twin Towers collapsed too rapidly and with too much violence for the NIST explanation to
be even remotely valid;; the temperatures attained during the destruction were much too high; the
acceleration of the buildings during their collapses was much too smooth. Well over one hundred first
responders witnessed explosions at the on-set of the collapses. Small chips of nano-thermitic composite
materials – a highly sophisticated explosive, has been found and documented by an international team of
scientists in large quantities in the dust of the debris at the World Trade Center.

This work is published in Open Chemistry/Physics Journal, "Active Thermitic Material
Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe." One of its authors, Niels H. Harrit
in a German interview in May 2009, said: "There are no experts on nano-thermite without connections to
the military…. This stuff has only been prepared under military contracts in the USA and probably in
bigger allied countries. This is secret military research…It was not prepared in a cave in Afghanistan."

Senior Counsel for the 9/11 Commission, John Farmer, disclosed in his book, The Ground Truth
“...at some level of the government, at some point in time…there was an agreement not to tell the truth
about what happened... I was shocked at how different the truth was from the way it was described ….
The [Norad air defense] tapes told a radically different story from what had been told to us and the
public for two years. This is not spin.” Whenever contact is lost with any airplane, fighter jets routinely
take to the air to investigate. This commonly occurs about 100 times per year in well under 20 minutes.
But on 9/11 nearly two hours passed without any interception.

There were also warnings of the impending attacks from other countries; plus insiders such as
John Ashcroft, top military officers, and San Francisco Mayor Willie Brown were warned not to fly.
Additional evidence of foreknowledge came from insider trading. Shortly before 9/11, tens of millions
that were made by Put options on American Airlines show 99% probability of illegal insider trading.

Evidence meant to implicate 19 Arabs as hijackers of four planes (passports, business cards, and
so on) alleged to have survived the fiery plane impacts is not credible and suggests a staged crime scene.
Furthermore, since seven alleged hijackers were housed on US military bases, two lived with an
undercover FBI agent, and many others, like alleged flight 93 pilot Ziad Samir Jarrah, were brought over
to flight school in Florida by CIA agents, we must conclude that the training was part of a cover story
concocted by US intelligence, and that most of these 9/11 alleged hijackers were NOT involved, or were
unwitting patsies, to say nothing of the nine who showed up still alive AFTER 9/11. Hundreds of
contradictions exist that were omitted in the official version.

I, _ _the undersigned citizen of the United States, affirm the duty and right of all citizens of these
United States of America to take action in accordance with US Code 18, Section 2382 on Misprision of
felony (treason), and affirm that I have or will soon discharge my duty and right under its provisions,
and affirm that the officials so informed are required to act in a manner honoring their sworn oaths to
uphold and protect principles of the US Constitution.

Signed on this date ____________________ by _______________________________________

18 USC Sec. 2382. Misprision of treason -  http://uscode.house.gov/download/pls/18C115.txt  

9/11 Commission Report: Omissions and Distortions, by David Ray Griffin, Northampton, MA: Olive Branch, 2004.

“118 Firefighters' Testimony to Explosions in the Twin Towers”, by Graeme McQueen, August 21, 2006

“Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe”, by Neils H. Harrit, et al.,
Open Chemistry/Physics Journal, Vol. 2, 2009

“Did nano-thermite take down the WTC?”, interview with Dr. Niels Harrit, RT, July 9, 2009

The Mysterious Collapse of World Trade Center 7, Why the Final Official Report about 9/11 is Unscientific and False,
b y David Ray Griffin, Northampton, MA: Olive Branch, 2009.

“What We Now Know about the Alleged 9-11 Hijackers”,by Jay Kolar in The Hidden History of 9-11,
2nd edition, P. Zarembka, editor, New York: Seven Stories Press, 2008, pp. 3-44 and 293-304.

“Unusual Option Market Activity and the Terrorist Attacks of September 11, 2001”, Allen M. Poteshman,
Journal of Business, Vol. 79, no. 4, 2006, pp. 1703-1726.

Please send a copy of your statement, and experiences in filing with Judge and Governor, and letters to editor to:
Truth Over Treason – Peace Action – P.O. Box 99; Wendell Depot, MA 01380 – For linking Online www.FlybyNews.com

[the original of this document can be downloaded as a pdf file at http://files.meetup.com/300645/Truth%20Over%20Treason.pdf ]

return to jump page